Radiometric dating flaws debunked

Therefore, one can use the measured ratio of potassium to argon in a given mineral to infer the time at which the mineral crystallized and began to accumulate argon (note: 40Ca is not considered in the equation, because it is a common isotope that is already abundant in the rock).

Over the years, Answers in Genesis has committed to undermining the credibility of radiometric dating techniques.This definition can be misleading, however, without some qualification.First, all radiometric dating methods are scientific models used to estimate the age of geologic events, provided a number of physical assumptions regarding the rock's history are met.While such geological complexities pose additional challenges to geochronologists, even "bad" dates can be very useful.My hope is to convince you this is the case through the following example, and that Ai G had prematurely discredited the K-Ar dating method. Doolan provides a convincing case against the credibility of K-Ar dating.

Leave a Reply